AMD RYZEN 3 3100 PC

With that, on April 21 st, AMD announced its new Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryprocessors. After a very successful launch of Ryzen Mobile 4000, leading to some stellar reviews, it was clear that the mobile silicon was commanding a strong premium in the market, and so we get Matisse based CPUs coming to the sub-$200 segment instead. With the recent launch of AMD’s latest Ryzen Mobile generation APUs, based on Zen 2 and Vega, we were unsure whether AMD would fill this sub-$200 gap with desktop versions of those APUs, or offer lower binned Ryparts. For a long time, AMD did nothing, pushing users to its Ryzen 2000 hardware or Ryzen 3000 APUs, namely because they were selling really well (the Ryzen 2600 / 1600 AF offers 6 cores for as low as $85). This leaves the door open for AMD, so it was always going to be interesting what the company did here. Intel has been neglecting this market of late, due to the abnormally high demand for Xeon silicon forcing manufacturing to spend more time on 28-core hardware than quad-core hardware. That’s all well and good for the higher end of the market, however in the sub-$200 category, this is where the volume often is. As we noted in our recent CPU buyers’ guide, out of the top 10 spots on Amazon’s best seller list for CPUs, AMD has 8 of them, and the first 5. Others, like the Ryzen 5 3600, are some of the best sellers in Amazon’s top list. At each price point, the company offered a compelling option against the competition, as we’ve noted in our reviews of hardware like the 3950X, 3900X, and 3700X. AMD Ryzen 3000 CPUs: Chiplets Go MainstreamĪfter successful launches of the Ryzen 9, Ryzen 7, and Ryzen 5 families of Zen 2 hardware, AMD has been sitting pretty at north of $200. AMD has sold quad-core CPUs at $99 for a while, but this is the new core and the new manufacturing process, so would this be any different? We put them up against a $350 quad core from three years ago. Inside is a single chiplet with only four cores active out of eight, pushing up to 4.3 GHz but the kicker was the low price of $120 for the high frequency version, or $99 for a bit slower. If you rely heavily upon storage transfer rates then they could be the perfect foundation for an affordable, blisteringly fast, server or HTPC.When AMD announced the new Ryzen 3 processors built on Zen 2, I was under the impression that these were essentially the reject parts from AMD’s successful Ryzen 3000 line. PCI Express 4.0 on processors that are sub £150. What really stands out is that AMD has kept the PCI Express 4.0 support on these Ryzen 3 CPUs. The Ryzen 3 3300X also has everything on one block which should make a tiny difference by lowering latency across the die and lowering the amount of data repetition by using a single, combined cache. Otherwise, they both have 256KB of L1, 2MB of L2 and 16MB of 元 Cache married to a four-core, eight-thread die.

Of course, pitching at a price point only works if the products themselves are similarly attractive, so let's fire up the X570 test rig and find out.īoth the Ryand Ryzen 3 3300X have very similar specifications, with the 3300X having a faster boost clock speed and an increase in the regular speed too.

AMD RYZEN 3 3100 PC

Four cores and Four Gigahertz for around the price of four new PC games is impressive stuff from AMD. You barely have to cast your mind back at all to recall the price at which Intel's regular quad Core i7 processors used to retail, which makes the appearance of two quad-core CPUs, with hyperthreading, and good clock speeds, both coming in under £150, something of an eye-opener. The original Ryzen processors were good, but in the 2nd and particularly the 3rd generation they are transformative, eliminating any minor weaknesses in the AMD approach and challenging Intel's models in nearly every regard.Īll of which preamble brings us to today's pair of processors, the AMD Ryand Ryzen 3 3300X. 64 core processors are fine for jaw-dropping scores, but they're hardly what you're going to build your next system around to dominate League of Legends.ĪMD have been stalwarts of the affordable processors since we can remember, and with their Ryzen range, they have kept up this cost-conscious mindset whilst radically revolutionising how they approached designing a CPU and what it's capabilities could be. It does, however, leave us feeling conflicted when it comes to thinking about what we could actually afford to run, and indeed our readers. Anyone interested in anything at all enjoys playing with the expensive toys.

We would be lying if we suggested that reviewing ultimate, high-end, multi-thousand-pound processors wasn't fun.

Amd ryzen 3 3100